Articles

Metasploit Framework Windows Tutorial
Remote Desktop Connection
Windows Processes That May Be Dangerous
How-To use NetCat a Tutorial
Common Linux Commands
Common Ports
Netcat Commands
HTTP Response Codes
War-Google Hack Terms
Wardriving
Avoiding Social Engineering and Phishing Attacks
Intrusion Detection on Linux
Linux Intrusion Detection
Penetration Testing Guide
Penetration Testing Tools
Social Engineering Fundamentals, Part I: Hacker Tactics
Social engineering (computer security)
The Psychology of Social Engineering

The Archives

General GSO
GovernmentSecurity.org News & Suggestions
In The News
Open Topic
General Security Information
Trash Can
Exploit & Vulnerability Mailing List Archives
Trial Member Forum
Product and Program Reviews GSO Tutorials
System Security
Windows Systems
Beginners Section
Linux & Unix Systems
File Downloads
Exploit Research & Discussion Trojan & Virus Errata
Networking Security / Firewall / IDS / VPN / Routers
System Hardening
E-Mail Security
Wifi Security
Trial Member Uploads
Upload discovered Trojans & Mal ware
GSO Programming Section
C , C++ , VC++
Visual Basic.NET
Perl /CGI
Java/Javascript
PHP/XML/ASP/HTML
Assembly + Other
The Cork Board
Network Security Consultant Directory
Network Security Jobs
The Archives
Encryption Information
General Network Security
Internet Anonymity
HTTP Protocol Security
Linux Security
MS IIS Information
Exploit Articles
Programming / Tool Design
GSO Software Projects
Public Downloads
Microsoft Security Questions and Papers

Nitron
I've been experimenting with the suckit rootkit, and I've determined that either A) it can't really hide processes, or cool.gif I've set it up wrong. But the file-hiding works perfectly, so...I'm leaning towards just finding another way to hide processes. Any ideas?
Also, I KNOW I setup adore-ng wrong, as it just..dies. THis is my output:

# ./ava I
Checking for adore 0.12 or higher ...
Tried to authorized myself. No luck, no adore?
Found adore 1.-1 installed. Please update adore.
ELITE_UID: <removed>, ELITE_GID=<removed>, ADORE_KEY=<removed> CURRENT_ADORE=<removed>

adore 1.-1? What? Is there a way to remove it and start over? Obviously, rmmod won't work...Thanks in advance
Salvia
QUOTE(Nitron @ Jun 27 2005, 03:15 PM)
I've been experimenting with the suckit rootkit, and I've determined that either A) it can't really hide processes, or cool.gif I've set it up wrong. But the file-hiding works perfectly, so...I'm leaning towards just finding another way to hide processes. Any ideas?
Also, I KNOW I setup adore-ng wrong, as it just..dies. THis is my output:

# ./ava I
Checking for adore  0.12 or higher ...
Tried to authorized myself. No luck, no adore?
Found adore 1.-1 installed. Please update adore.
ELITE_UID: <removed>, ELITE_GID=<removed>, ADORE_KEY=<removed> CURRENT_ADORE=<removed>

adore 1.-1? What? Is there a way to remove it and start over? Obviously, rmmod won't work...Thanks in advance
*




I cannot possibly see the point in learning to use a rootkit that is not intended for wrong doing.

now if you were trying to learn how to write a rootkit, or write an exploit that would be a different story, but flat out learning how to use or install a rootkit is just umm must I say script-kiddie behavior

you might as well be asking someone how to install subseven

Nitron
QUOTE(Salvia @ Jun 29 2005, 05:27 AM)

I cannot possibly see the point in learning to use a rootkit that is not intended for wrong doing.

now if you were trying to learn how to write a rootkit, or write an exploit that would be a different story, but flat out learning how to use or install a rootkit is just umm must I say script-kiddie behavior



So, you simply ASSUMED that I am not in the process of writing said rootkit. I am, thank you very much. I was looking at adore for ideas. Don't just assume someone is a script kiddie without checking the intent first.

By the way, ProcFS is obnoxious.
mulander
I think that you could write your own 'ps' command, and switch it with the one on the machine.
It would work as the usual 'ps' command but would not display the processes you want to hide.
Nitron
That's a little messy, don't you think? You have to deal with linking the right libraries and all that. Plus, from the "dark side", so to speak, you then have to deal with applications such as tripwire. I was leaning towards an LKM solution, and I already found out how to do it. It's fairly simple; just pull the entry out of the linked list of processes in the kernel.
icywolf
If you need the easiest method go for a modified ps but as mentionned tripwire is able to detect it. Best method is still the kernel module but it's still detectable...
Nitron
QUOTE(icywolf @ Jul 9 2005, 10:33 AM)
Best method is still the kernel module but it's still detectable...
*



Interestingly enough, my LKM loads, hides a process by PID passed on the command line (Example: insmod rootkit.o 809) and then can be removed, leaving it NEARLY undetectable. It's not quite a perfect system, but it works.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2005 Invision Power Services, Inc.