Articles

Metasploit Framework Windows Tutorial
Remote Desktop Connection
Windows Processes That May Be Dangerous
How-To use NetCat a Tutorial
Common Linux Commands
Common Ports
Netcat Commands
HTTP Response Codes
War-Google Hack Terms
Wardriving
Avoiding Social Engineering and Phishing Attacks
Intrusion Detection on Linux
Linux Intrusion Detection
Penetration Testing Guide
Penetration Testing Tools
Social Engineering Fundamentals, Part I: Hacker Tactics
Social engineering (computer security)
The Psychology of Social Engineering

The Archives

General GSO
GovernmentSecurity.org News & Suggestions
In The News
Open Topic
General Security Information
Trash Can
Exploit & Vulnerability Mailing List Archives
Trial Member Forum
Product and Program Reviews GSO Tutorials
System Security
Windows Systems
Beginners Section
Linux & Unix Systems
File Downloads
Exploit Research & Discussion Trojan & Virus Errata
Networking Security / Firewall / IDS / VPN / Routers
System Hardening
E-Mail Security
Wifi Security
Trial Member Uploads
Upload discovered Trojans & Mal ware
GSO Programming Section
C , C++ , VC++
Visual Basic.NET
Perl /CGI
Java/Javascript
PHP/XML/ASP/HTML
Assembly + Other
The Cork Board
Network Security Consultant Directory
Network Security Jobs
The Archives
Encryption Information
General Network Security
Internet Anonymity
HTTP Protocol Security
Linux Security
MS IIS Information
Exploit Articles
Programming / Tool Design
GSO Software Projects
Public Downloads
Microsoft Security Questions and Papers

Salvia
what is the difference between FreeBSD's base OpenSSH and OpenSSH portable?
myth
OpenSSH Portable is basically the version for non-*bsd (net/free/open) systems like linux. When you install openssh onto a linux system, for example, OpenSSH Portable is actually installed.

When you install OpenSSH onto NetBSD, OpenBSD, FreeBSD (are there more ?) you install the OpenSSH for base FreeBSD.....


Why ? Well one of the reasons is, PAM. FreeBSD doesnt use PAM ... But Linux boxes do, so they get the portable version....
Salvia
the base install does support pam, but the question comes to mind because the portable version is also available in the ports tree of freeBSD
myth
the base install, from what i can now tell from a couple google searches, does not support PAM. I maybe interpretting wrong - but thats what i've gathered. And thats why you will find OpenSSH-Portable in the FreeBSD port tree

Correct me if i'm wrong, http://taosecurity.blogspot.com/2004/10/last-freebsd-5.html

QUOTE
1. OpenSSH is part of the base FreeBSD operating system.
2. OpenSSH exists as the security/openssh port. This version is like OpenSSH for OpenBSD due to the similarity between FreeBSD and OpenBSD's code.
3. OpenSSH exists as the openssh-portable port. This version is specifically for non-OpenBSD systems.

Confused? According to this thread, OpenBSD's lack of support for PAM means the OpenBSD native version (option 2) doesn't offer PAM. Since FreeBSD does use PAM, options 1 and 3 make use of PAM.

This means that if you want your OpenSSH authentication to use PAM on FreeBSD, you can use the OpenSSH integrated into the FreeBSD base (like using integrated BIND) or you can install the openssh-portable port (like using the BIND port).


(Take note though, that website is dated October 2004 - things may have changed.)
Salvia
QUOTE
Confused? According to this thread, OpenBSD's lack of support for PAM means the OpenBSD native version (option 2) doesn't offer PAM. Since FreeBSD does use PAM, options 1 and 3 make use of PAM.



But thank you the rest of that did answer my question smile.gif
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2005 Invision Power Services, Inc.