QUOTE(myth @ Jul 12 2005, 08:11 PM)
QUOTE
If there's nothing for 'a' network, it can be considerated that it's a secure 'network' and should be used instead of well known b and g (with a little bit encryption of course).
Its that kind of statement that suggest 'security by obscurity' .... Which nowadays has been proven wrong ten fold... Dont consider this secure, please dont, its a really idiotic statement/assumption to make....
Assumption is the mother of all f**k ups
I mean a 802.11a with equal security as a 802.11b network, you have less risk to be hacked
--------------------------------------
tikbalang, do you have some paper explaining what you said, i'm interested.