Articles

Metasploit Framework Windows Tutorial
Remote Desktop Connection
Windows Processes That May Be Dangerous
How-To use NetCat a Tutorial
Common Linux Commands
Common Ports
Netcat Commands
HTTP Response Codes
War-Google Hack Terms
Wardriving
Avoiding Social Engineering and Phishing Attacks
Intrusion Detection on Linux
Linux Intrusion Detection
Penetration Testing Guide
Penetration Testing Tools
Social Engineering Fundamentals, Part I: Hacker Tactics
Social engineering (computer security)
The Psychology of Social Engineering

The Archives

General GSO
GovernmentSecurity.org News & Suggestions
In The News
Open Topic
General Security Information
Trash Can
Exploit & Vulnerability Mailing List Archives
Trial Member Forum
Product and Program Reviews GSO Tutorials
System Security
Windows Systems
Beginners Section
Linux & Unix Systems
File Downloads
Exploit Research & Discussion Trojan & Virus Errata
Networking Security / Firewall / IDS / VPN / Routers
System Hardening
E-Mail Security
Wifi Security
Trial Member Uploads
Upload discovered Trojans & Mal ware
GSO Programming Section
C , C++ , VC++
Visual Basic.NET
Perl /CGI
Java/Javascript
PHP/XML/ASP/HTML
Assembly + Other
The Cork Board
Network Security Consultant Directory
Network Security Jobs
The Archives
Encryption Information
General Network Security
Internet Anonymity
HTTP Protocol Security
Linux Security
MS IIS Information
Exploit Articles
Programming / Tool Design
GSO Software Projects
Public Downloads
Microsoft Security Questions and Papers

Mr_X
I often read thing and speak about things related to security of 802.11b and g networks. Lots of tools exist to audit security such as kismet, aircrack, void11, and so on.
But what about 802.11a networks? Does exist tools like those i described before for 802.11a networks (except netstumbler).
If there's nothing for 'a' network, it can be considerated that it's a secure 'network' and should be used instead of well known b and g (with a little bit encryption of course).
nolimit
a is simply outdated and less sparsely used. Some of the tools you mentioned support a adapters. Just look smile.gif
myth
QUOTE
If there's nothing for 'a' network, it can be considerated that it's a secure 'network' and should be used instead of well known b and g (with a little bit encryption of course).


Its that kind of statement that suggest 'security by obscurity' .... Which nowadays has been proven wrong ten fold... Dont consider this secure, please dont, its a really idiotic statement/assumption to make....

Assumption is the mother of all f**k ups
tikbalang
802.11b/g are developed to enhance security and other features of 802.11a. the lack of security in the 802.11a is the main reason why most company are hesitant to implement it.

-tikz
Mr_X
QUOTE(myth @ Jul 12 2005, 08:11 PM)
QUOTE
If there's nothing for 'a' network, it can be considerated that it's a secure 'network' and should be used instead of well known b and g (with a little bit encryption of course).


Its that kind of statement that suggest 'security by obscurity' .... Which nowadays has been proven wrong ten fold... Dont consider this secure, please dont, its a really idiotic statement/assumption to make....

Assumption is the mother of all f**k ups
*



I mean a 802.11a with equal security as a 802.11b network, you have less risk to be hacked
--------------------------------------

tikbalang, do you have some paper explaining what you said, i'm interested.
tikbalang
Mr_X... you might want to read some information here.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2005 Invision Power Services, Inc.