|
We Need Just 4 years of Ron Paul |
|
|
|
Elections are closing in and Ron Paul has just had one of the biggest single days in fund raising ever. A political candidate who has had limited main stream publicity has built his campaign on viral marketing techniques, and it is proving effective. His ideas are the chemo shot the country needs, but just like chemo I don't think the country can take it for 8 years.
The United States has gotten slightly out of control. We have ruined our reputation with outside countries and have demonstrated an aggressiveness rivaling any other imperialistic nation. Has this been all bad? Well not really it has brought our economy to the point that it is and allowed us to become a super power, but like nay other corporate conglomerates we have gotten out of control, so what would any board of directors do at this point (the board of directors in the united states is the voting public) they bring in a new CEO, with much more conservative policies so that the corporation has time to deal with internal operations before heading back to an expansion strategy.
Now any country just like any company must expand or become outdated and non influential. That is why I believe Ron Paul is good for a 4 year stint, it will give us time to reflect on internal controls. Give us some time to get back into the fiscal black, while not permanently changing the face of this country.
--BW
Related Items:
|
